Nov 19, 2009 10:10 a.m.
Radiation from mammograms are dangerous on the other hand thermograms are far safer with a 97 percent sensitivity to detect breast cancer. The CBS News reports in this video that thermography is also FDA approved.
Then why are all US hospitals using ancient radiation machines like Mammogram technology that do more harm to possible tumors? Why is thermography being ingnored as the cancer industry fumbles to spin the failures of mammogram machines.
Thermography Detects Cancer Before Tumors Grow
Thermography can detect tumors before they happen by documenting temperature changes and cold spots in the breast. Thermography is painless, does not give the patient radiation, is cost effective and totally harmless. You can have several thermograms every year without worry and pain.
The question remains: Why is the US government funding such ancient medical equipment that doesn’t even work and gives women cancer?
TAGS: the cancer industry, thermography effectiveness, mammograms ancient medicine, radiation from mammograms, breast cancer detection, cancer, cancer causing tests.
Women that want to continue to subject themselves to harmful radiation and tumor metastitis by damaging a possible tumor really need to explore the alternatives that are healthy, safe and 100 times more effective in breast cancer detection.
Women must learn not to accept the status quo and accept what the cancer industry calls the Gold Standard in breast cancer detection. Women must arm themselves with the best tools, the safest methods and not rely on old ancient and dangerous machines that are ineffective and promoted for profit.
Related posts:
- Mammogram Debate and the Cancer Business
- 2009 Breast Cancer Screening New Guidelines
- NBC Ann Curry Alternative Doctors -Suzanne Somers
- CNN Interviews Suzanne Somers-Knockout
- Pfizer Drugs-Hit with Billion Dollar Fines
