Comments on: AP Survey-75 % Fear Swine Flu Vaccine Side Effects

By: Toni

Toni — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:05:48 +0000

liston people! if doctors would tell you the truth about what you need to eat to get rid of the flu they would lose so much money. EAT: (organic)
baby white button mushrooms- activate the killer T-cells in your ammune system to figth off viral infections

Eat yougert with live active cultures- activate the good bactera in your body to fight off bad bactera ex: bacteral infection.
salmon and sunflower seed;s also build a strong ammune system! here are your ingeredents to warn off a cold or flu! invest in nature not in scam doctor’s wallets or the governments!

By: D

Fri, 22 Jan 2010 06:52:41 +0000

I agree with both the Editor and Chris. Untested and not validated medicine is unacceptable to be used on our children. Our children is not for experiment and pharmaceutical corporate business profits. Our children are our future. Our future is not a bunch of sick citizens.

By: politicol

politicol — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:56:11 +0000

Thanks for your comments Chris and your totally right. The media is using double talk to confuse and scare people into getting this deadly swine vaccine full of cancer causing chemicals. It no more will save you from the N1H1 vaccine -but will damage your immune system permanently.

Don’t forget the National TV Networks like NBC, CBS, CNN, and ABC all get millions of dollars or advertising revenue from drug company’s and they must distort the information that they call news but is actually paid for information which is corrupt.
The news people are getting is falsified to make sure people get the swine shot it will damage half the population and create more sick people to take more drugs and vaccines.
We cannot believe the distortion in the national networks it is just illegal to present the false data, and manipulated numbers of swine deaths which are not caused by the flu -there are underlying illnesses that caused death.

This is a hyped up media campaign – paid and bought for by pharmaceuticals that make the swine vaccine -and they are taking away your rights by making the government enforce illegal laws – it is a system of government corruption in favor of corporate profits.

P. Neisman
Editor

By: Chris

Chris — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:08:05 +0000

My local CA news stated last week that the N1H1 vaccine does contain mercury. That it was baned from vaccines in the past, however since the N1H1 vaccine is new and the only form made contains mercury they allowed it as an exception. They then told of mercury dangers to babies inutero, and followed immediatly by locations to get the shot for pregnant women and children the next day. I had to rewind 3 times on DVR to hear it again, and that is what they announced. Vaccine has mercury, is dangerous, but here is where you can go if you choose to get it anyway. CDC website states (up to) 2 in every million people vaccinated may get Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS). In CA we ordered 6 million vaccines. That’s 12 people. Feeling lucky? Id personally rather be sick for a few days, and/or take care of a sick kid than risk perment brain damage and life altering side effects. But that’s just me. To each their own right? Free country and what not…

By: Alldredge

Alldredge — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:11:16 +0000

Carefully selecting your words and strategically placing them on a page to create impulsive reactions from the reader can lead to a direct sell.

By: politicol

politicol — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:08:28 +0000

“Once again the mercury is no longer present in the shots.” Where is your proof? It is a well known fact Christian that thermisol is an active ingredient of “all flu and other vaccines”. Just because there are some exposures to mercury in the atmosphere does not make it safe to inject it into the bloodstream of a human being. Your premise is causing more damage than any benefit. Perhaps you would like to explain why drug company’s do not use saline solution as a preservative instead of mercury? Your siting Chernobyl is not a valid argument as to why any person would want “more mercury” and especially in a unproven vaccine. Your points are just not valid please do some basic research on the poisoning caused by mercury.

By: politicol

politicol — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:02:30 +0000

Emma Mcdonagh if you truly did your research on Squalene you would discover that this is a very dangerous ingredient to play with in a vaccine. If you are indeed interested as a pregnant mother you would understand that squalene was never approved by the FDA until July 2009 to reduce the cost of the swine vaccine for drug manufacturers. It is “not safe” and more countries are calling for its removal.
We do hope that as you find the right information you will have more balanced opinion: the fetus cannot get rid of the toxins in the swine vaccine and it will remain permanently damaged.
Please read up on squalene from sources that are not funded by drug company money:
see: Squalene Laced H1N1 Vaccines is Pharmacological Warfare

By: Christian

Christian — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 01:51:00 +0000

Once again the mercury is no longer present in the shots. Also the amount of it that used to be in the flu shot is a fraction to what you are exposed in natural environment. Flu shots are given to people all over the world and seems like the autism is only rampant in USA. People like you spread this nonsense quoting unknown scientists and fake name professors just like you did regarding nuclear power plants. Burning coal puts far more mercury and radioactive isotopes in the air than the Chernobyl accident except that were concentrated in one area. Please take some basic high school chemistry and physics courses and stop spreading the fear. I’m not saying you shall question authority, but do it with some scientific backing and not fear and propaganda and two bit analogy.

By: Emma

Emma — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:22:33 +0000

The information you have presented here is leaning towards scare mongering and its more than a little worrying – i am seraching for info. on Squalene which is why i found your article – as i am pregnant and have been offered the vaccine, so wish to find out the FACTS about the ingredients and the known effects – and to weigh up the pro’s and cons. From the reading I have done the information you have given about squalene is wrong. I am not medically trained so will not go into details – but would warn readers to be sure to get a BALANCED view of the FACTS about the illness as well as the vaccine. The info. i have to date is that Squalene is naturally occuring and produced in the processes daily undertaken by the growing fetus and therefore the presence of it in the vaccine should not present a problem to the unborn baby. although, as already mentioned i am not medically trained and am still undecided about the vaccine myself, just wanted to offer another piece of info. to others that may be searching online as i am.

Editors’ Note: The American public is afraid more of the vaccine than the swine flu. That is a fact that drug company’s now have to live with for creating such a damaging and dangerous vaccine-but the choice is up to the individual -not the media and certainly not the drug company literature. Just read the pamphlet that accompanies the N1H1 Vaccine -you will find the truth.

By: politicol

politicol — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 01:32:18 +0000

Dorina: Do you believe your government is always right? Do you also believe chemicals in your bloodstream such as mercury and aluminum are not natural and cause cancer? I think we answered your questions. Governments only do what politicians decided and politicians are getting big dollars from drug company’s for their own politicol campaigns. Did you also know that television networks get millions of dollars of advertising revenue from drug companies?

Now do you see why the government and your Ministry of Health Care are pushing vaccines -even if they are dangerous?
Thanks for your comments though – you should read up on what is really happening in government these days.

Politicol News.